TY  - CONF
AU  - Kušar, Matej
AU  - Linneberg, Poul
AU  - Amado, João Luís
AU  - Mašović, Snežana
AU  - Nikola, Tanasić
AU  - Hajdin, Rade
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2657
AB  - The main objective of the COST Action TU1406 is to develop a guideline for the establishment of Quality Control plans for roadway bridges. The guideline is based on conclusions of Working groups 1 and 2 of the Action and is further developed with the contributions and findings of members of Working group 3. The paper presents the overview of the developed framework, where gradual damage processes as well as sudden events are being addressed in evaluation of Key Performance Indicators. The proposed framework relies on data from design and construction phase, as well as from results from visual inspections that are used for an assessment of safety and serviceability - the primary concerns of bridge managers. Special attention is aimed at possible Failure modes and related bridge Vulnerable zones. These are, for instance high moment regions, high shear regions and constructions joints, but can also be zones of bridge conceptual weaknesses. Since there are differences in design and materials for various bridge types, the suitability of the framework is tested separately for girder/frame bridges and arch bridges. Due to the specifics of sudden events, the application of the framework is given separately from gradual damage processes. Emphasis is given on flooding and scour as these are the most common culprits of bridge failures. The steps in the implementation of the framework are briefly shown and an illustrative example is presented.
C3  - IABSE Symposium, Guimaraes 2019: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management - Report, 2019
T1  - Quality control plan for road bridges – Overview of COST Action TU1406 WG3 final report
EP  - 1305
SP  - 1298
DO  - DOI:10.2749/guimaraes.2019.1298
DO  - DOI:10.2749/guimaraes.2019.1298
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Kušar, Matej and Linneberg, Poul and Amado, João Luís and Mašović, Snežana and Nikola, Tanasić and Hajdin, Rade",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The main objective of the COST Action TU1406 is to develop a guideline for the establishment of Quality Control plans for roadway bridges. The guideline is based on conclusions of Working groups 1 and 2 of the Action and is further developed with the contributions and findings of members of Working group 3. The paper presents the overview of the developed framework, where gradual damage processes as well as sudden events are being addressed in evaluation of Key Performance Indicators. The proposed framework relies on data from design and construction phase, as well as from results from visual inspections that are used for an assessment of safety and serviceability - the primary concerns of bridge managers. Special attention is aimed at possible Failure modes and related bridge Vulnerable zones. These are, for instance high moment regions, high shear regions and constructions joints, but can also be zones of bridge conceptual weaknesses. Since there are differences in design and materials for various bridge types, the suitability of the framework is tested separately for girder/frame bridges and arch bridges. Due to the specifics of sudden events, the application of the framework is given separately from gradual damage processes. Emphasis is given on flooding and scour as these are the most common culprits of bridge failures. The steps in the implementation of the framework are briefly shown and an illustrative example is presented.",
journal = "IABSE Symposium, Guimaraes 2019: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management - Report, 2019",
title = "Quality control plan for road bridges – Overview of COST Action TU1406 WG3 final report",
pages = "1305-1298",
doi = "DOI:10.2749/guimaraes.2019.1298, DOI:10.2749/guimaraes.2019.1298"
}

Kušar, M., Linneberg, P., Amado, J. L., Mašović, S., Nikola, T.,& Hajdin, R.. (2019). Quality control plan for road bridges – Overview of COST Action TU1406 WG3 final report. in IABSE Symposium, Guimaraes 2019: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management - Report, 2019, 1298-1305.
https://doi.org/DOI:10.2749/guimaraes.2019.1298

Kušar M, Linneberg P, Amado JL, Mašović S, Nikola T, Hajdin R. Quality control plan for road bridges – Overview of COST Action TU1406 WG3 final report. in IABSE Symposium, Guimaraes 2019: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management - Report, 2019. 2019;:1298-1305.
doi:DOI:10.2749/guimaraes.2019.1298 .

Kušar, Matej, Linneberg, Poul, Amado, João Luís, Mašović, Snežana, Nikola, Tanasić, Hajdin, Rade, "Quality control plan for road bridges – Overview of COST Action TU1406 WG3 final report" in IABSE Symposium, Guimaraes 2019: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management - Report, 2019 (2019):1298-1305,
https://doi.org/DOI:10.2749/guimaraes.2019.1298 . .

TY  - RPRT
AU  - Hajdin, Rade
AU  - Kušar, Matej
AU  - Mašović, Snežana
AU  - Linneberg, Poul
AU  - Amado, João Luís
AU  - Tanasić, Nikola
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2389
AB  - There is a broad consensus that the benefits of road infrastructure for the society cannot be overestimated. The investments in road infrastructure raise the growth potential of a national economy, which can be fully exploited by efficient utilization of the road infrastructure. It is difficult to quantify the economic benefit of road infrastructure but its lower bound is estimated to be between 4% (U.S. DOT, 2015) and 10% (Kurte & Esser, 2008), (ARE, ASTRA, 2006) of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Apart from purely economic benefit, the road infrastructure enables road users to be involved in various activities that yield private, public and social benefits (Frischmann, 2012). Maintaining these benefits on the long run in economically efficient, environmentally responsible and socially reconcilable manner, is the fundamental task of road authorities. They are bound to provide fast, safe, comfortable, and affordable travel. The quality control plan here presented specifies all activities and tools, needed to ensure quality. In case of road infrastructure, the quality control plan defines the extent and the interval of inspections or investigations and data necessary to estimate key performance indicators (KPI) and forecast their future development. Quality control plan also includes decision model that suggest maintenance action based on the forecast of key performance indicators.
AB  - Postoji širok konsenzus da se društvena dobit od drumske infrastrukture ne sme potceniti. Ulaganja u putnu infrastrukturu povećavaju potencijal rasta nacionalne ekonomije, koji se može u potpunosti iskoristiti efikasnim korišćenjem putne infrastrukture. Teško je kvantifikovati ekonomsku korist putne infrastrukture, ali procenjuje se da je njena donja granica između 4% (US DOT, 2015) i 10% (Kurte & Esser, 2008), (ARE, ASTRA, 2006) bruto domaćeg proizvoda (BDP). Osim čisto ekonomske koristi, putna infrastruktura omogućava učesnicima u saobraćaju da budu uključeni u različite aktivnosti koje donose privatnu, javnu i društvenu korist (Frischmann, 2012). Održavanje ovih beneficija na dugi rok na ekonomski efikasan, ekološki odgovoran i društveno pomiran način, osnovni je zadatak putnih vlasti. Oni su dužni da obezbede brzo, sigurno, udobno i pristupačno putovanje. Ovdje predstavljeni plan kontrole kvaliteta specificira sve aktivnosti i alate potrebne za osiguranje kvaliteta. U slučaju putne infrastrukture, plan kontrole kvaliteta definiše obim i interval inspekcija ili istraživanja i podatke neophodne za procenu ključnih pokazatelja učinka (KPI) i predviđanje njihovog budućeg razvoja. Plan kontrole kvaliteta takođe uključuje model odlučivanja koji predlaže akcije održavanja na osnovu predviđanja ključnih pokazatelja učinka.
T2  - TU1406 - Quality specifications for roadway bridges, standardization at a European level (BridgeSpec)
T1  - Establishment of a Quality Control Plan - WG3
T1  - Establishment of a Quality Control Plan - WG3
DO  - 10.13140/RG.2.2.28730.03526
ER  - 

@techreport{
author = "Hajdin, Rade and Kušar, Matej and Mašović, Snežana and Linneberg, Poul and Amado, João Luís and Tanasić, Nikola",
year = "2018",
abstract = "There is a broad consensus that the benefits of road infrastructure for the society cannot be overestimated. The investments in road infrastructure raise the growth potential of a national economy, which can be fully exploited by efficient utilization of the road infrastructure. It is difficult to quantify the economic benefit of road infrastructure but its lower bound is estimated to be between 4% (U.S. DOT, 2015) and 10% (Kurte & Esser, 2008), (ARE, ASTRA, 2006) of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Apart from purely economic benefit, the road infrastructure enables road users to be involved in various activities that yield private, public and social benefits (Frischmann, 2012). Maintaining these benefits on the long run in economically efficient, environmentally responsible and socially reconcilable manner, is the fundamental task of road authorities. They are bound to provide fast, safe, comfortable, and affordable travel. The quality control plan here presented specifies all activities and tools, needed to ensure quality. In case of road infrastructure, the quality control plan defines the extent and the interval of inspections or investigations and data necessary to estimate key performance indicators (KPI) and forecast their future development. Quality control plan also includes decision model that suggest maintenance action based on the forecast of key performance indicators., Postoji širok konsenzus da se društvena dobit od drumske infrastrukture ne sme potceniti. Ulaganja u putnu infrastrukturu povećavaju potencijal rasta nacionalne ekonomije, koji se može u potpunosti iskoristiti efikasnim korišćenjem putne infrastrukture. Teško je kvantifikovati ekonomsku korist putne infrastrukture, ali procenjuje se da je njena donja granica između 4% (US DOT, 2015) i 10% (Kurte & Esser, 2008), (ARE, ASTRA, 2006) bruto domaćeg proizvoda (BDP). Osim čisto ekonomske koristi, putna infrastruktura omogućava učesnicima u saobraćaju da budu uključeni u različite aktivnosti koje donose privatnu, javnu i društvenu korist (Frischmann, 2012). Održavanje ovih beneficija na dugi rok na ekonomski efikasan, ekološki odgovoran i društveno pomiran način, osnovni je zadatak putnih vlasti. Oni su dužni da obezbede brzo, sigurno, udobno i pristupačno putovanje. Ovdje predstavljeni plan kontrole kvaliteta specificira sve aktivnosti i alate potrebne za osiguranje kvaliteta. U slučaju putne infrastrukture, plan kontrole kvaliteta definiše obim i interval inspekcija ili istraživanja i podatke neophodne za procenu ključnih pokazatelja učinka (KPI) i predviđanje njihovog budućeg razvoja. Plan kontrole kvaliteta takođe uključuje model odlučivanja koji predlaže akcije održavanja na osnovu predviđanja ključnih pokazatelja učinka.",
journal = "TU1406 - Quality specifications for roadway bridges, standardization at a European level (BridgeSpec)",
title = "Establishment of a Quality Control Plan - WG3, Establishment of a Quality Control Plan - WG3",
doi = "10.13140/RG.2.2.28730.03526"
}

Hajdin, R., Kušar, M., Mašović, S., Linneberg, P., Amado, J. L.,& Tanasić, N.. (2018). Establishment of a Quality Control Plan - WG3. in TU1406 - Quality specifications for roadway bridges, standardization at a European level (BridgeSpec).
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28730.03526

Hajdin R, Kušar M, Mašović S, Linneberg P, Amado JL, Tanasić N. Establishment of a Quality Control Plan - WG3. in TU1406 - Quality specifications for roadway bridges, standardization at a European level (BridgeSpec). 2018;.
doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.28730.03526 .

Hajdin, Rade, Kušar, Matej, Mašović, Snežana, Linneberg, Poul, Amado, João Luís, Tanasić, Nikola, "Establishment of a Quality Control Plan - WG3" in TU1406 - Quality specifications for roadway bridges, standardization at a European level (BridgeSpec) (2018),
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28730.03526 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - José Matos, José
AU  - Solgaard, Anders
AU  - Linneberg, Poul
AU  - Silva, Mauricio Sanchez
AU  - Strauss, Alfred
AU  - Stipanovic, Irina
AU  - Casas, Joan
AU  - Mašović, Snežana
AU  - Caprani, Colin
AU  - Novak, Drahomir
AU  - Akiyama, Mitsuyoshi
PY  - 2018
UR  - https://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2656
AB  - Tools, guidelines and standards for assessment of Life Cycle Cost (LCC) of built environment e.g. buildings, infrastructure assets etc. have gained impact over the past years. Owner and operator application of tools, guidelines and standards enhances optimization of operation and maintenance with due respect to their budgets. In order to aid owners, operators and their designers, a task group under fib has been established to prepare a state-of-the-art report regarding LCC analyses of concrete assets. The state-of-the-art report contains a description of existing LCC standards and guidelines, their applicability, the definition of different cost elements, and the treatment of uncertain information in a reliability or risk based framework, etc. providing the reader with background information and methodology for preparation of such analysis. Moreover, the report contains case studies, presenting the applicability of the LCC analysis methodology.
C3  - IABSE Conference 2018 –Engineering the Past, to Meet the Needs of the Future June 25-27 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark
T1  - Life Cycle Cost Management of Concrete Structures
EP  - 136
SP  - 130
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_2656
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "José Matos, José and Solgaard, Anders and Linneberg, Poul and Silva, Mauricio Sanchez and Strauss, Alfred and Stipanovic, Irina and Casas, Joan and Mašović, Snežana and Caprani, Colin and Novak, Drahomir and Akiyama, Mitsuyoshi",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Tools, guidelines and standards for assessment of Life Cycle Cost (LCC) of built environment e.g. buildings, infrastructure assets etc. have gained impact over the past years. Owner and operator application of tools, guidelines and standards enhances optimization of operation and maintenance with due respect to their budgets. In order to aid owners, operators and their designers, a task group under fib has been established to prepare a state-of-the-art report regarding LCC analyses of concrete assets. The state-of-the-art report contains a description of existing LCC standards and guidelines, their applicability, the definition of different cost elements, and the treatment of uncertain information in a reliability or risk based framework, etc. providing the reader with background information and methodology for preparation of such analysis. Moreover, the report contains case studies, presenting the applicability of the LCC analysis methodology.",
journal = "IABSE Conference 2018 –Engineering the Past, to Meet the Needs of the Future June 25-27 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark",
title = "Life Cycle Cost Management of Concrete Structures",
pages = "136-130",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_2656"
}

José Matos, J., Solgaard, A., Linneberg, P., Silva, M. S., Strauss, A., Stipanovic, I., Casas, J., Mašović, S., Caprani, C., Novak, D.,& Akiyama, M.. (2018). Life Cycle Cost Management of Concrete Structures. in IABSE Conference 2018 –Engineering the Past, to Meet the Needs of the Future June 25-27 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark, 130-136.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_2656

José Matos J, Solgaard A, Linneberg P, Silva MS, Strauss A, Stipanovic I, Casas J, Mašović S, Caprani C, Novak D, Akiyama M. Life Cycle Cost Management of Concrete Structures. in IABSE Conference 2018 –Engineering the Past, to Meet the Needs of the Future June 25-27 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2018;:130-136.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_2656 .

José Matos, José, Solgaard, Anders, Linneberg, Poul, Silva, Mauricio Sanchez, Strauss, Alfred, Stipanovic, Irina, Casas, Joan, Mašović, Snežana, Caprani, Colin, Novak, Drahomir, Akiyama, Mitsuyoshi, "Life Cycle Cost Management of Concrete Structures" in IABSE Conference 2018 –Engineering the Past, to Meet the Needs of the Future June 25-27 2018, Copenhagen, Denmark (2018):130-136,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_2656 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Linneberg, Poul
AU  - Mašović, Snežana
AU  - Hajdin, Rade
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2225
AB  - Infrastructure Managers works every day according to some kind of Quality Control Plan (QCP) in order to ensure a desired quality with minimum traffic interruption balancing cost, risks (implicit or explicit) and performance. These QCPs varies significantly among European countries, which urges the establishment of a common European guideline. COST TU1406 Working Group 3 has the aim of providing a detailed explanation of the steps towards the establishment of a QCP. The approach is generic and evaluates performance values with due attention to: 1) Structure and its constitutive element incl. background material such as birth certificates, 2) Time-dependent Performance Indicators (PI) from observations (e.g. spalling) with due reference to the underlying deterioration processes (e.g. alkali-silica reaction) and 3) Related Key Performance Indicators (KPI) based on the Dutch risk-driven maintenance concept RAMSSHE€P, ref. [1]. This paper outline QCP's for concrete girder and frame bridges.
C3  - IABSE Symposium 2017, Engineering the Future, Vancouver, Canada, IABSE Symposium Report
T1  - Quality Control Plans for Girder and Frame Bridges
EP  - .2666
SP  - 2659
VL  - 109
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_2225
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Linneberg, Poul and Mašović, Snežana and Hajdin, Rade",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Infrastructure Managers works every day according to some kind of Quality Control Plan (QCP) in order to ensure a desired quality with minimum traffic interruption balancing cost, risks (implicit or explicit) and performance. These QCPs varies significantly among European countries, which urges the establishment of a common European guideline. COST TU1406 Working Group 3 has the aim of providing a detailed explanation of the steps towards the establishment of a QCP. The approach is generic and evaluates performance values with due attention to: 1) Structure and its constitutive element incl. background material such as birth certificates, 2) Time-dependent Performance Indicators (PI) from observations (e.g. spalling) with due reference to the underlying deterioration processes (e.g. alkali-silica reaction) and 3) Related Key Performance Indicators (KPI) based on the Dutch risk-driven maintenance concept RAMSSHE€P, ref. [1]. This paper outline QCP's for concrete girder and frame bridges.",
journal = "IABSE Symposium 2017, Engineering the Future, Vancouver, Canada, IABSE Symposium Report",
title = "Quality Control Plans for Girder and Frame Bridges",
pages = ".2666-2659",
volume = "109",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_2225"
}

Linneberg, P., Mašović, S.,& Hajdin, R.. (2017). Quality Control Plans for Girder and Frame Bridges. in IABSE Symposium 2017, Engineering the Future, Vancouver, Canada, IABSE Symposium Report, 109, 2659-.2666.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_2225

Linneberg P, Mašović S, Hajdin R. Quality Control Plans for Girder and Frame Bridges. in IABSE Symposium 2017, Engineering the Future, Vancouver, Canada, IABSE Symposium Report. 2017;109:2659-.2666.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_2225 .

Linneberg, Poul, Mašović, Snežana, Hajdin, Rade, "Quality Control Plans for Girder and Frame Bridges" in IABSE Symposium 2017, Engineering the Future, Vancouver, Canada, IABSE Symposium Report, 109 (2017):2659-.2666,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_2225 .