Shake‑table testing of a stone masonry building aggregate: overview of blind prediction study
Autori
Tomić, IgorPenna, Andrea
DeJong, Matthew
Butenweg, Christoph
Correia, Antonio
Candeias, Paulo Xavier
Senaldi, Ilaria
Guerrini, Gabriele
Malomo, Daniele
Wilding, Bastian
Pettinga, Didier
Spanenburg, Mark
Galanakis, N.
Oliver, S.
Parisse, Francesco
Marques, Rui
Cattari, Serena
Lourenco, Paulo
Galvez, Francisco
Dizhur, Dmytro
Ingham, Jason
Ramaglia, Giancarlo
Lignola, Gian Piero
Prota, Andrea
AlShawa, Omar
Liberatore, Domenico
Sorrentino, Luigi
Gagliardo, Raffaele
Godio, Michele
Portioli, Francesco
Landolfo, Raffaele
Solarino, Fabio
Bianchini, Nicoletta
Ciocci, Maria Pia
Romanazzi, Antonio
Asikoglu, Abide
D'Anna, Jennifer
Ramirez, Rafael
Romis, Federico
Marinković, Marko
Đorđević, Filip
Beyer, Katrin
Članak u časopisu (Objavljena verzija)
Metapodaci
Prikaz svih podataka o dokumentuApstrakt
City centres of Europe are often composed of unreinforced masonry structural aggregates, whose seismic response is challenging to predict. To advance the state of the art on the seismic response of these aggregates, the Adjacent Interacting Masonry Structures (AIMS) subproject from Horizon 2020 project Seismology and Earthquake Engineering Research Infrastructure Alliance for Europe (SERA) provides shake-table test data of a two-unit, double-leaf stone masonry aggregate subjected to two horizontal components of dynamic excitation. A blind prediction was organized with participants from academia and industry to test modelling approaches and assumptions and to learn about the extent of uncertainty in modelling for such masonry aggregates. The participants were provided with the full set of material and geometrical data, construction details and original seismic input and asked to predict prior to the test the expected seismic response in terms of damage mechanisms, base-shear forces, and... roof displacements. The modelling approaches used differ significantly in the level of detail and the modelling assumptions. This paper provides an overview of the adopted modelling approaches and their subsequent predictions. It further discusses the range of assumptions made when modelling masonry walls, floors and connections, and aims at discovering how the common solutions regarding modelling masonry in general, and masonry aggregates in particular, affect the results. The results are evaluated both in terms of damage mechanisms, base shear forces, displacements and interface openings in both directions, and then compared with the experimental results. The modelling approaches featuring Discrete Element Method (DEM) led to the best predictions in terms of displacements, while a submission using rigid block limit analysis led to the best prediction in terms of damage mechanisms. Large coefficients of variation of predicted displacements and general underestimation of displacements in comparison with experimental results, except for DEM models, highlight the need for further consensus building on suitable modelling assumptions for such masonry aggregates.
Ključne reči:
Historical masonry / Masonry aggregates / Incremental dynamic analysis / Shake-table test / Blind predictionIzvor:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2023Kolekcije
Institucija/grupa
GraFarTY - JOUR AU - Tomić, Igor AU - Penna, Andrea AU - DeJong, Matthew AU - Butenweg, Christoph AU - Correia, Antonio AU - Candeias, Paulo Xavier AU - Senaldi, Ilaria AU - Guerrini, Gabriele AU - Malomo, Daniele AU - Wilding, Bastian AU - Pettinga, Didier AU - Spanenburg, Mark AU - Galanakis, N. AU - Oliver, S. AU - Parisse, Francesco AU - Marques, Rui AU - Cattari, Serena AU - Lourenco, Paulo AU - Galvez, Francisco AU - Dizhur, Dmytro AU - Ingham, Jason AU - Ramaglia, Giancarlo AU - Lignola, Gian Piero AU - Prota, Andrea AU - AlShawa, Omar AU - Liberatore, Domenico AU - Sorrentino, Luigi AU - Gagliardo, Raffaele AU - Godio, Michele AU - Portioli, Francesco AU - Landolfo, Raffaele AU - Solarino, Fabio AU - Bianchini, Nicoletta AU - Ciocci, Maria Pia AU - Romanazzi, Antonio AU - Asikoglu, Abide AU - D'Anna, Jennifer AU - Ramirez, Rafael AU - Romis, Federico AU - Marinković, Marko AU - Đorđević, Filip AU - Beyer, Katrin PY - 2023 UR - https://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3060 AB - City centres of Europe are often composed of unreinforced masonry structural aggregates, whose seismic response is challenging to predict. To advance the state of the art on the seismic response of these aggregates, the Adjacent Interacting Masonry Structures (AIMS) subproject from Horizon 2020 project Seismology and Earthquake Engineering Research Infrastructure Alliance for Europe (SERA) provides shake-table test data of a two-unit, double-leaf stone masonry aggregate subjected to two horizontal components of dynamic excitation. A blind prediction was organized with participants from academia and industry to test modelling approaches and assumptions and to learn about the extent of uncertainty in modelling for such masonry aggregates. The participants were provided with the full set of material and geometrical data, construction details and original seismic input and asked to predict prior to the test the expected seismic response in terms of damage mechanisms, base-shear forces, and roof displacements. The modelling approaches used differ significantly in the level of detail and the modelling assumptions. This paper provides an overview of the adopted modelling approaches and their subsequent predictions. It further discusses the range of assumptions made when modelling masonry walls, floors and connections, and aims at discovering how the common solutions regarding modelling masonry in general, and masonry aggregates in particular, affect the results. The results are evaluated both in terms of damage mechanisms, base shear forces, displacements and interface openings in both directions, and then compared with the experimental results. The modelling approaches featuring Discrete Element Method (DEM) led to the best predictions in terms of displacements, while a submission using rigid block limit analysis led to the best prediction in terms of damage mechanisms. Large coefficients of variation of predicted displacements and general underestimation of displacements in comparison with experimental results, except for DEM models, highlight the need for further consensus building on suitable modelling assumptions for such masonry aggregates. T2 - Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering T1 - Shake‑table testing of a stone masonry building aggregate: overview of blind prediction study DO - 10.1007/s10518-022-01582-x ER -
@article{ author = "Tomić, Igor and Penna, Andrea and DeJong, Matthew and Butenweg, Christoph and Correia, Antonio and Candeias, Paulo Xavier and Senaldi, Ilaria and Guerrini, Gabriele and Malomo, Daniele and Wilding, Bastian and Pettinga, Didier and Spanenburg, Mark and Galanakis, N. and Oliver, S. and Parisse, Francesco and Marques, Rui and Cattari, Serena and Lourenco, Paulo and Galvez, Francisco and Dizhur, Dmytro and Ingham, Jason and Ramaglia, Giancarlo and Lignola, Gian Piero and Prota, Andrea and AlShawa, Omar and Liberatore, Domenico and Sorrentino, Luigi and Gagliardo, Raffaele and Godio, Michele and Portioli, Francesco and Landolfo, Raffaele and Solarino, Fabio and Bianchini, Nicoletta and Ciocci, Maria Pia and Romanazzi, Antonio and Asikoglu, Abide and D'Anna, Jennifer and Ramirez, Rafael and Romis, Federico and Marinković, Marko and Đorđević, Filip and Beyer, Katrin", year = "2023", abstract = "City centres of Europe are often composed of unreinforced masonry structural aggregates, whose seismic response is challenging to predict. To advance the state of the art on the seismic response of these aggregates, the Adjacent Interacting Masonry Structures (AIMS) subproject from Horizon 2020 project Seismology and Earthquake Engineering Research Infrastructure Alliance for Europe (SERA) provides shake-table test data of a two-unit, double-leaf stone masonry aggregate subjected to two horizontal components of dynamic excitation. A blind prediction was organized with participants from academia and industry to test modelling approaches and assumptions and to learn about the extent of uncertainty in modelling for such masonry aggregates. The participants were provided with the full set of material and geometrical data, construction details and original seismic input and asked to predict prior to the test the expected seismic response in terms of damage mechanisms, base-shear forces, and roof displacements. The modelling approaches used differ significantly in the level of detail and the modelling assumptions. This paper provides an overview of the adopted modelling approaches and their subsequent predictions. It further discusses the range of assumptions made when modelling masonry walls, floors and connections, and aims at discovering how the common solutions regarding modelling masonry in general, and masonry aggregates in particular, affect the results. The results are evaluated both in terms of damage mechanisms, base shear forces, displacements and interface openings in both directions, and then compared with the experimental results. The modelling approaches featuring Discrete Element Method (DEM) led to the best predictions in terms of displacements, while a submission using rigid block limit analysis led to the best prediction in terms of damage mechanisms. Large coefficients of variation of predicted displacements and general underestimation of displacements in comparison with experimental results, except for DEM models, highlight the need for further consensus building on suitable modelling assumptions for such masonry aggregates.", journal = "Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering", title = "Shake‑table testing of a stone masonry building aggregate: overview of blind prediction study", doi = "10.1007/s10518-022-01582-x" }
Tomić, I., Penna, A., DeJong, M., Butenweg, C., Correia, A., Candeias, P. X., Senaldi, I., Guerrini, G., Malomo, D., Wilding, B., Pettinga, D., Spanenburg, M., Galanakis, N., Oliver, S., Parisse, F., Marques, R., Cattari, S., Lourenco, P., Galvez, F., Dizhur, D., Ingham, J., Ramaglia, G., Lignola, G. P., Prota, A., AlShawa, O., Liberatore, D., Sorrentino, L., Gagliardo, R., Godio, M., Portioli, F., Landolfo, R., Solarino, F., Bianchini, N., Ciocci, M. P., Romanazzi, A., Asikoglu, A., D'Anna, J., Ramirez, R., Romis, F., Marinković, M., Đorđević, F.,& Beyer, K.. (2023). Shake‑table testing of a stone masonry building aggregate: overview of blind prediction study. in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01582-x
Tomić I, Penna A, DeJong M, Butenweg C, Correia A, Candeias PX, Senaldi I, Guerrini G, Malomo D, Wilding B, Pettinga D, Spanenburg M, Galanakis N, Oliver S, Parisse F, Marques R, Cattari S, Lourenco P, Galvez F, Dizhur D, Ingham J, Ramaglia G, Lignola GP, Prota A, AlShawa O, Liberatore D, Sorrentino L, Gagliardo R, Godio M, Portioli F, Landolfo R, Solarino F, Bianchini N, Ciocci MP, Romanazzi A, Asikoglu A, D'Anna J, Ramirez R, Romis F, Marinković M, Đorđević F, Beyer K. Shake‑table testing of a stone masonry building aggregate: overview of blind prediction study. in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 2023;. doi:10.1007/s10518-022-01582-x .
Tomić, Igor, Penna, Andrea, DeJong, Matthew, Butenweg, Christoph, Correia, Antonio, Candeias, Paulo Xavier, Senaldi, Ilaria, Guerrini, Gabriele, Malomo, Daniele, Wilding, Bastian, Pettinga, Didier, Spanenburg, Mark, Galanakis, N., Oliver, S., Parisse, Francesco, Marques, Rui, Cattari, Serena, Lourenco, Paulo, Galvez, Francisco, Dizhur, Dmytro, Ingham, Jason, Ramaglia, Giancarlo, Lignola, Gian Piero, Prota, Andrea, AlShawa, Omar, Liberatore, Domenico, Sorrentino, Luigi, Gagliardo, Raffaele, Godio, Michele, Portioli, Francesco, Landolfo, Raffaele, Solarino, Fabio, Bianchini, Nicoletta, Ciocci, Maria Pia, Romanazzi, Antonio, Asikoglu, Abide, D'Anna, Jennifer, Ramirez, Rafael, Romis, Federico, Marinković, Marko, Đorđević, Filip, Beyer, Katrin, "Shake‑table testing of a stone masonry building aggregate: overview of blind prediction study" in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering (2023), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01582-x . .