TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vanoutrive, Hanne
AU  - Van den Heede, Philip
AU  - Alderete, Natalia
AU  - Andrade, Carmen
AU  - Bansal, Tushar
AU  - Camoer, Aires
AU  - Cizer, Ozlem
AU  - De Belie, Nele
AU  - Ducman, Vilma
AU  - Etxeberria, Miren
AU  - Frederickx, Lander
AU  - Grengg, Cyrill
AU  - Ignjatović, Ivan
AU  - Ling, Tung-Chai
AU  - Liu, Zhiyuan
AU  - Garcia-Lodeiro, Ines
AU  - Lothenbach, Barbara
AU  - Medina Martinez, Cesar
AU  - Sanchez-Montero, Javier
AU  - Olonade, Kolawole
AU  - Palomo, Angel
AU  - Tri Phung, Quoc
AU  - Rebolledo, Nuria
AU  - Sakoparnig, Marlene
AU  - Siderris, Kosmas
AU  - Thiel, Charlotte
AU  - Visalakshi, Talakokula
AU  - Vollpracht, Anya
AU  - von Greve-Dierfeld, Stefanie
AU  - Wei, Jinxin
AU  - Wu, Bei
AU  - Zajac, Maciej
AU  - Zhao, Zengfeng
AU  - Gruyaert, Elke
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3158
AB  - Many (inter)national standards exist to evaluate the resistance of mortar and concrete to carbonation. When a carbonation coefficient is used for performance comparison of mixtures or service life prediction, the applied boundary conditions during curing, preconditioning and carbonation play a crucial role, specifically when using latent hydraulic or pozzolanic supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). An extensive interlaboratory test (ILT) with twenty two participating laboratories was set up in the framework of RILEM TC 281-CCC ‘Carbonation of Concrete with SCMs’. The carbonation depths and coefficients determined by following several (inter)national standards for three cement types (CEM I, CEM II/B-V, CEM III/B) both on mortar and concrete scale were statistically compared. The outcomes of this study showed that the carbonation rate based on the carbonation depths after 91 days exposure, compared to 56 days or less exposure duration, best approximates the slope of the linear regression and those 91 days carbonation depths can therefore be considered as a good estimate of the potential resistance to carbonation. All standards evaluated in this study ranked the three cement types in the same order of carbonation resistance. Unfortunately, large variations within and between laboratories complicate to draw clear conclusions regarding the effect of sample pre-conditioning and carbonation exposure conditions on the carbonation performance of the specimens tested. Nevertheless, it was identified that fresh and hardened state properties alone cannot be used to infer carbonation resistance of the mortars or concretes tested. It was also found that sealed curing results in larger carbonation depths compared to water curing. However, when water curing was reduced from 28 to 3 or 7 days, higher carbonation depths compared to sealed curing were observed. This increase is more pronounced for CEM I compared to CEM III mixes. The variation between laboratories is larger than the potential effect of raising the CO2 concentration from 1 to 4%. Finally, concrete, for which the aggregate-to-cement factor was increased by 1.79 in comparison with mortar, had a carbonation coefficient 1.18 times the one of mortar.
PB  - Springer
T2  - Materials and Structures
T1  - Report of RILEM TC 281-CCC: outcomes of a round robin on the resistance to accelerated carbonation of Portland, Portland-fly ash and blast-furnace blended cements
IS  - 99
VL  - 55
DO  - 10.1617/s11527-022-01927-7
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Vanoutrive, Hanne and Van den Heede, Philip and Alderete, Natalia and Andrade, Carmen and Bansal, Tushar and Camoer, Aires and Cizer, Ozlem and De Belie, Nele and Ducman, Vilma and Etxeberria, Miren and Frederickx, Lander and Grengg, Cyrill and Ignjatović, Ivan and Ling, Tung-Chai and Liu, Zhiyuan and Garcia-Lodeiro, Ines and Lothenbach, Barbara and Medina Martinez, Cesar and Sanchez-Montero, Javier and Olonade, Kolawole and Palomo, Angel and Tri Phung, Quoc and Rebolledo, Nuria and Sakoparnig, Marlene and Siderris, Kosmas and Thiel, Charlotte and Visalakshi, Talakokula and Vollpracht, Anya and von Greve-Dierfeld, Stefanie and Wei, Jinxin and Wu, Bei and Zajac, Maciej and Zhao, Zengfeng and Gruyaert, Elke",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Many (inter)national standards exist to evaluate the resistance of mortar and concrete to carbonation. When a carbonation coefficient is used for performance comparison of mixtures or service life prediction, the applied boundary conditions during curing, preconditioning and carbonation play a crucial role, specifically when using latent hydraulic or pozzolanic supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). An extensive interlaboratory test (ILT) with twenty two participating laboratories was set up in the framework of RILEM TC 281-CCC ‘Carbonation of Concrete with SCMs’. The carbonation depths and coefficients determined by following several (inter)national standards for three cement types (CEM I, CEM II/B-V, CEM III/B) both on mortar and concrete scale were statistically compared. The outcomes of this study showed that the carbonation rate based on the carbonation depths after 91 days exposure, compared to 56 days or less exposure duration, best approximates the slope of the linear regression and those 91 days carbonation depths can therefore be considered as a good estimate of the potential resistance to carbonation. All standards evaluated in this study ranked the three cement types in the same order of carbonation resistance. Unfortunately, large variations within and between laboratories complicate to draw clear conclusions regarding the effect of sample pre-conditioning and carbonation exposure conditions on the carbonation performance of the specimens tested. Nevertheless, it was identified that fresh and hardened state properties alone cannot be used to infer carbonation resistance of the mortars or concretes tested. It was also found that sealed curing results in larger carbonation depths compared to water curing. However, when water curing was reduced from 28 to 3 or 7 days, higher carbonation depths compared to sealed curing were observed. This increase is more pronounced for CEM I compared to CEM III mixes. The variation between laboratories is larger than the potential effect of raising the CO2 concentration from 1 to 4%. Finally, concrete, for which the aggregate-to-cement factor was increased by 1.79 in comparison with mortar, had a carbonation coefficient 1.18 times the one of mortar.",
publisher = "Springer",
journal = "Materials and Structures",
title = "Report of RILEM TC 281-CCC: outcomes of a round robin on the resistance to accelerated carbonation of Portland, Portland-fly ash and blast-furnace blended cements",
number = "99",
volume = "55",
doi = "10.1617/s11527-022-01927-7"
}

Vanoutrive, H., Van den Heede, P., Alderete, N., Andrade, C., Bansal, T., Camoer, A., Cizer, O., De Belie, N., Ducman, V., Etxeberria, M., Frederickx, L., Grengg, C., Ignjatović, I., Ling, T., Liu, Z., Garcia-Lodeiro, I., Lothenbach, B., Medina Martinez, C., Sanchez-Montero, J., Olonade, K., Palomo, A., Tri Phung, Q., Rebolledo, N., Sakoparnig, M., Siderris, K., Thiel, C., Visalakshi, T., Vollpracht, A., von Greve-Dierfeld, S., Wei, J., Wu, B., Zajac, M., Zhao, Z.,& Gruyaert, E.. (2022). Report of RILEM TC 281-CCC: outcomes of a round robin on the resistance to accelerated carbonation of Portland, Portland-fly ash and blast-furnace blended cements. in Materials and Structures
Springer., 55(99).
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-01927-7

Vanoutrive H, Van den Heede P, Alderete N, Andrade C, Bansal T, Camoer A, Cizer O, De Belie N, Ducman V, Etxeberria M, Frederickx L, Grengg C, Ignjatović I, Ling T, Liu Z, Garcia-Lodeiro I, Lothenbach B, Medina Martinez C, Sanchez-Montero J, Olonade K, Palomo A, Tri Phung Q, Rebolledo N, Sakoparnig M, Siderris K, Thiel C, Visalakshi T, Vollpracht A, von Greve-Dierfeld S, Wei J, Wu B, Zajac M, Zhao Z, Gruyaert E. Report of RILEM TC 281-CCC: outcomes of a round robin on the resistance to accelerated carbonation of Portland, Portland-fly ash and blast-furnace blended cements. in Materials and Structures. 2022;55(99).
doi:10.1617/s11527-022-01927-7 .

Vanoutrive, Hanne, Van den Heede, Philip, Alderete, Natalia, Andrade, Carmen, Bansal, Tushar, Camoer, Aires, Cizer, Ozlem, De Belie, Nele, Ducman, Vilma, Etxeberria, Miren, Frederickx, Lander, Grengg, Cyrill, Ignjatović, Ivan, Ling, Tung-Chai, Liu, Zhiyuan, Garcia-Lodeiro, Ines, Lothenbach, Barbara, Medina Martinez, Cesar, Sanchez-Montero, Javier, Olonade, Kolawole, Palomo, Angel, Tri Phung, Quoc, Rebolledo, Nuria, Sakoparnig, Marlene, Siderris, Kosmas, Thiel, Charlotte, Visalakshi, Talakokula, Vollpracht, Anya, von Greve-Dierfeld, Stefanie, Wei, Jinxin, Wu, Bei, Zajac, Maciej, Zhao, Zengfeng, Gruyaert, Elke, "Report of RILEM TC 281-CCC: outcomes of a round robin on the resistance to accelerated carbonation of Portland, Portland-fly ash and blast-furnace blended cements" in Materials and Structures, 55, no. 99 (2022),
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-01927-7 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - von Greve-Dierfeld, Stefanie
AU  - Lothenbach, Barbara
AU  - Vollpracht, Anya
AU  - Wu, Bei
AU  - Huet, Bruno
AU  - Andrade, Carmen
AU  - Medina Martinez, Cesar
AU  - Thiel, Charlotte
AU  - Gruyaert, Elke
AU  - Vanoutrive, Hanne
AU  - F. Sae ´z del Bosque, Isabel
AU  - Ignjatović, Ivan
AU  - Elsen, Jan
AU  - L. Provis, John
AU  - Scrivener, Karen
AU  - Thienel, Karl-Christian
AU  - Sideris, Kosmas
AU  - Zajac, Maciej
AU  - Alderete, Natalia
AU  - Cizer, Ozlem
AU  - Van den Heede, Philip
AU  - Douglas Hooton, Robert
AU  - Kamali-Bernard, Siham
AU  - A. Bernal, Susan
AU  - Zhao, Zengfeng
AU  - Shi, Zhenguo
AU  - De Belie, Nele
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3159
AB  - Blended cements, where Portland cement clinker is partially replaced by supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), provide the most feasible route for reducing carbon dioxide emissions associated with concrete production. However, lowering the clinker content can lead to an increasing risk of neutralisation of the concrete pore solution and potential reinforcement corrosion due to carbonation.carbonation of concrete with SCMs differs from carbonation of concrete solely based on Portland cement (PC). This is a consequence of the differences in the hydrate phase assemblage and pore solution chemistry, as well as the pore structure and transport properties, when varying the binder composition, age and curing conditions of the concretes. The carbonation mechanism and kinetics also depend on the saturation degree of the concrete and CO2 partial pressure which in turn depends on exposure conditions (e.g. relative humidity, volume, and duration of water
in contact with the concrete surface and temperature
conditions). This in turn influence the microstructural
changes identified upon carbonation. This literature
review, prepared by members of RILEM technical
committee 281-CCC carbonation of concrete with
supplementary cementitious materials, working
groups 1 and 2, elucidates the effect of numerous
SCM characteristics, exposure environments and
curing conditions on the carbonation mechanism,
kinetics and structural alterations in cementitious
systems containing SCMs.
PB  - Springer
T2  - Materials and Structures
T1  - Understanding the carbonation of concrete with supplementary cementitious materials: a critical review by RILEM TC 281-CCC
IS  - 136
VL  - 53
DO  - 10.1617/s11527-020-01558-w
ER  - 

@article{
author = "von Greve-Dierfeld, Stefanie and Lothenbach, Barbara and Vollpracht, Anya and Wu, Bei and Huet, Bruno and Andrade, Carmen and Medina Martinez, Cesar and Thiel, Charlotte and Gruyaert, Elke and Vanoutrive, Hanne and F. Sae ´z del Bosque, Isabel and Ignjatović, Ivan and Elsen, Jan and L. Provis, John and Scrivener, Karen and Thienel, Karl-Christian and Sideris, Kosmas and Zajac, Maciej and Alderete, Natalia and Cizer, Ozlem and Van den Heede, Philip and Douglas Hooton, Robert and Kamali-Bernard, Siham and A. Bernal, Susan and Zhao, Zengfeng and Shi, Zhenguo and De Belie, Nele",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Blended cements, where Portland cement clinker is partially replaced by supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs), provide the most feasible route for reducing carbon dioxide emissions associated with concrete production. However, lowering the clinker content can lead to an increasing risk of neutralisation of the concrete pore solution and potential reinforcement corrosion due to carbonation.carbonation of concrete with SCMs differs from carbonation of concrete solely based on Portland cement (PC). This is a consequence of the differences in the hydrate phase assemblage and pore solution chemistry, as well as the pore structure and transport properties, when varying the binder composition, age and curing conditions of the concretes. The carbonation mechanism and kinetics also depend on the saturation degree of the concrete and CO2 partial pressure which in turn depends on exposure conditions (e.g. relative humidity, volume, and duration of water
in contact with the concrete surface and temperature
conditions). This in turn influence the microstructural
changes identified upon carbonation. This literature
review, prepared by members of RILEM technical
committee 281-CCC carbonation of concrete with
supplementary cementitious materials, working
groups 1 and 2, elucidates the effect of numerous
SCM characteristics, exposure environments and
curing conditions on the carbonation mechanism,
kinetics and structural alterations in cementitious
systems containing SCMs.",
publisher = "Springer",
journal = "Materials and Structures",
title = "Understanding the carbonation of concrete with supplementary cementitious materials: a critical review by RILEM TC 281-CCC",
number = "136",
volume = "53",
doi = "10.1617/s11527-020-01558-w"
}

von Greve-Dierfeld, S., Lothenbach, B., Vollpracht, A., Wu, B., Huet, B., Andrade, C., Medina Martinez, C., Thiel, C., Gruyaert, E., Vanoutrive, H., F. Sae ´z del Bosque, I., Ignjatović, I., Elsen, J., L. Provis, J., Scrivener, K., Thienel, K., Sideris, K., Zajac, M., Alderete, N., Cizer, O., Van den Heede, P., Douglas Hooton, R., Kamali-Bernard, S., A. Bernal, S., Zhao, Z., Shi, Z.,& De Belie, N.. (2020). Understanding the carbonation of concrete with supplementary cementitious materials: a critical review by RILEM TC 281-CCC. in Materials and Structures
Springer., 53(136).
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01558-w

von Greve-Dierfeld S, Lothenbach B, Vollpracht A, Wu B, Huet B, Andrade C, Medina Martinez C, Thiel C, Gruyaert E, Vanoutrive H, F. Sae ´z del Bosque I, Ignjatović I, Elsen J, L. Provis J, Scrivener K, Thienel K, Sideris K, Zajac M, Alderete N, Cizer O, Van den Heede P, Douglas Hooton R, Kamali-Bernard S, A. Bernal S, Zhao Z, Shi Z, De Belie N. Understanding the carbonation of concrete with supplementary cementitious materials: a critical review by RILEM TC 281-CCC. in Materials and Structures. 2020;53(136).
doi:10.1617/s11527-020-01558-w .

von Greve-Dierfeld, Stefanie, Lothenbach, Barbara, Vollpracht, Anya, Wu, Bei, Huet, Bruno, Andrade, Carmen, Medina Martinez, Cesar, Thiel, Charlotte, Gruyaert, Elke, Vanoutrive, Hanne, F. Sae ´z del Bosque, Isabel, Ignjatović, Ivan, Elsen, Jan, L. Provis, John, Scrivener, Karen, Thienel, Karl-Christian, Sideris, Kosmas, Zajac, Maciej, Alderete, Natalia, Cizer, Ozlem, Van den Heede, Philip, Douglas Hooton, Robert, Kamali-Bernard, Siham, A. Bernal, Susan, Zhao, Zengfeng, Shi, Zhenguo, De Belie, Nele, "Understanding the carbonation of concrete with supplementary cementitious materials: a critical review by RILEM TC 281-CCC" in Materials and Structures, 53, no. 136 (2020),
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01558-w . .