info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200092/RS/

Link to this page

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200092/RS/

Authors

Publications

Design cross-section resistances of perforated columns under compression

Ranisavljević, Maja; Dobrić, Jelena; Filipović, Aljoša; Spremić, Milan

(University of Montenegro, Faculty of Civil Engineering, 2024)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Ranisavljević, Maja
AU  - Dobrić, Jelena
AU  - Filipović, Aljoša
AU  - Spremić, Milan
PY  - 2024
UR  - https://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3483
AB  - Nowadays, numerous experimentally, numerically and analytically based research have been
performed to evaluate the structural responses and ultimate capacity of beams with web
openings, but mostly under bending. However, in practice, the application of steel cellular
elements dominantly loaded by axial pressure is very common. With the lack of appropriate
design approaches, we rely on engineering judgement, which can result in uneconomic, time-
consuming, or unsafe solutions. To ensure the safety of a structure it is necessary to assess its
structural resilience.
An overview of the existing experimental study on compressed I-section short columns with web
openings, assessment of the impact of openings’ size and shape on cross-section deformation
and resistance capacity under pure compression was performed. To accomplish an adequate and
easy-to-use design method for hot rolled perforated columns, the design procedures stated in: (i)
draft version of new European code prEN 1993-1-13, (ii) the Direct Strength Method (DSM) in
American standard AISI S100-16 and (iii) the Continuous Strength Method (CSM) in prEN
1993-1-4 were evaluated based on experimental data, and the obtained outcomes are briefly
presented in this paper. Although none of these design methods include all aspects of observed
case – hot rolled perforated elements under compression (Eurocode has a strict limit of axial
force, CSM and DSM primarily refer to cold-formed steel sections and do not recognize the
existence of openings at all), they turned out to be quite accurate. The corresponding results were
obtained by modifying those procedures, so they better reflect a case of interest. Thus, DSM
method didn’t need any modifications, and CSM had the most.
PB  - University of Montenegro, Faculty of Civil Engineering
C3  - Proceedings of The 9th International Conference "Civil Engineering – Science and Practice", Kolašin, 5-9th March 2024
T1  - Design cross-section resistances of perforated columns under compression
EP  - 354
SP  - 347
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_3483
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Ranisavljević, Maja and Dobrić, Jelena and Filipović, Aljoša and Spremić, Milan",
year = "2024",
abstract = "Nowadays, numerous experimentally, numerically and analytically based research have been
performed to evaluate the structural responses and ultimate capacity of beams with web
openings, but mostly under bending. However, in practice, the application of steel cellular
elements dominantly loaded by axial pressure is very common. With the lack of appropriate
design approaches, we rely on engineering judgement, which can result in uneconomic, time-
consuming, or unsafe solutions. To ensure the safety of a structure it is necessary to assess its
structural resilience.
An overview of the existing experimental study on compressed I-section short columns with web
openings, assessment of the impact of openings’ size and shape on cross-section deformation
and resistance capacity under pure compression was performed. To accomplish an adequate and
easy-to-use design method for hot rolled perforated columns, the design procedures stated in: (i)
draft version of new European code prEN 1993-1-13, (ii) the Direct Strength Method (DSM) in
American standard AISI S100-16 and (iii) the Continuous Strength Method (CSM) in prEN
1993-1-4 were evaluated based on experimental data, and the obtained outcomes are briefly
presented in this paper. Although none of these design methods include all aspects of observed
case – hot rolled perforated elements under compression (Eurocode has a strict limit of axial
force, CSM and DSM primarily refer to cold-formed steel sections and do not recognize the
existence of openings at all), they turned out to be quite accurate. The corresponding results were
obtained by modifying those procedures, so they better reflect a case of interest. Thus, DSM
method didn’t need any modifications, and CSM had the most.",
publisher = "University of Montenegro, Faculty of Civil Engineering",
journal = "Proceedings of The 9th International Conference "Civil Engineering – Science and Practice", Kolašin, 5-9th March 2024",
title = "Design cross-section resistances of perforated columns under compression",
pages = "354-347",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_3483"
}
Ranisavljević, M., Dobrić, J., Filipović, A.,& Spremić, M.. (2024). Design cross-section resistances of perforated columns under compression. in Proceedings of The 9th International Conference "Civil Engineering – Science and Practice", Kolašin, 5-9th March 2024
University of Montenegro, Faculty of Civil Engineering., 347-354.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_3483
Ranisavljević M, Dobrić J, Filipović A, Spremić M. Design cross-section resistances of perforated columns under compression. in Proceedings of The 9th International Conference "Civil Engineering – Science and Practice", Kolašin, 5-9th March 2024. 2024;:347-354.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_3483 .
Ranisavljević, Maja, Dobrić, Jelena, Filipović, Aljoša, Spremić, Milan, "Design cross-section resistances of perforated columns under compression" in Proceedings of The 9th International Conference "Civil Engineering – Science and Practice", Kolašin, 5-9th March 2024 (2024):347-354,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_3483 .