GraFar - Repository of the Faculty of Civil Engineering
Faculty of Civil Engineering of the University of Belgrade
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   GraFar
  • GraFar
  • Катедра за материјале и конструкције
  • View Item
  •   GraFar
  • GraFar
  • Катедра за материјале и конструкције
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

08.49: Comparison of headed studs with perfobond shear connectors - experimental and numerical analysis

Authorized Users Only
2017
Authors
Spremić, Milan
Gluhović, Nina
Marković, Zlatko
Dobrić, Jelena
Filipović, Aljoša
Conference object (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Different types of shear connectors which assure composite action between steel profile and concrete slabs have been developed during decades, considering different shapes, installation equipment and installation process. Also, three main characteristics of shear connectors, shear resistance, stiffness and ductility are specific for each type of shear connector. Widely used shear connectors for composite constructions of buildings and bridges are headed studs and different types of perfobond shear connectors. Different behaviour of these types of shear connectors, mainly reflected in unsatisfactory behaviour of headed studs resulted from fatigue problems, reflects in their various applications. Numerous experimental and numerical investigations performed with headed studs and perfobond shear connectors through standard push-out tests resulted in development of design procedures which are proposed by different a...uthors or can be found in current design codes such as EN 1994-1-1, ANSI/AISC-360-05 and JSCE. Comparison of heads stud’s and perfobond shear connector’s beahviour through experimental results of standard push-out tests are presented in this paper. Experimentally obtained shear resistance of four headed studs with 16 mm diameter and 100 mm height, positioned in one row into envisaged openings of prefabricated composite decks, with shear resistance of perfobond shear connectors are compared. Main differences in respect of ductility, stiffness and different failure modes which can be noticed for these types of shear connections, obtained from experimental investigation are analyzed in this paper. Comparative analysis includes different shapes, dimensions and specimen’s layout of perfobond shear connectors, experimentally investigated through standard push-out tests which results are available in different literature. Numerical analysis included perfobond shear connectors positioned into envisaged openings of prefabricated composite decks with same dimensions and material properties which are used for numerical analysis of considered headed studs shear connection and which are obtained from experimental investigation. Shear resistance obtained from numerical analysis of perfobond shear connectors are compared with design procedures developed from different authors.

Keywords:
perfobond / headed stud / shear connection / ductility
Source:
ce/papers, 2017, 1, 2-3, 2237-2246
Funding / projects:
  • Research on condition assessment and improvement methods of civil engineering structures in view of their serviceability, load-bearing capacity, cost effectiveness and maintenance (RS-36048)

DOI: 10.1002/cepa.270

ISSN: 2509-7075

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1520
Collections
  • Катедра за материјале и конструкције
Institution/Community
GraFar
TY  - CONF
AU  - Spremić, Milan
AU  - Gluhović, Nina
AU  - Marković, Zlatko
AU  - Dobrić, Jelena
AU  - Filipović, Aljoša
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1520
AB  - Different  types  of  shear  connectors  which  assure  composite  action  between  steel  profile  and concrete  slabs  have  been  developed  during  decades,  considering different  shapes,  installation equipment  and  installation  process.  Also,  three  main  characteristics  of  shear  connectors,  shear resistance, stiffness and ductility are specific for each type of shear connector. Widely used shear connectors  for  composite  constructions  of  buildings  and  bridges  are  headed  studs  and  different types of perfobond shear connectors. Different behaviour of these types of shear connectors, mainly reflected  in  unsatisfactory behaviour of headed  studs resulted from fatigue problems, reflects in their  various  applications.  Numerous  experimental  and  numerical  investigations  performed  with headed  studs  and  perfobond  shear  connectors  through  standard  push-out  tests  resulted  in development  of  design  procedures  which  are  proposed  by  different  authors  or  can  be  found  in current design codes such as EN 1994-1-1, ANSI/AISC-360-05 and JSCE. Comparison of heads stud’s and perfobond shear connector’s beahviour through experimental results of standard push-out tests are presented in this paper. Experimentally obtained shear resistance of four headed studs with 16  mm  diameter  and  100  mm  height,  positioned  in  one  row  into  envisaged  openings  of prefabricated composite decks, with shear resistance of perfobond shear connectors are compared. Main differences in respect of ductility, stiffness and different failure modes which can be noticed for these types of shear connections, obtained from experimental investigation are analyzed in this paper.  Comparative  analysis  includes  different  shapes,  dimensions  and  specimen’s  layout  of perfobond  shear  connectors,  experimentally  investigated  through  standard  push-out  tests  which results are available in different literature. Numerical analysis included perfobond shear connectors positioned into envisaged openings of prefabricated composite decks with same dimensions and material  properties  which  are  used  for  numerical  analysis  of  considered  headed  studs  shear connection and which are obtained from experimental investigation. Shear resistance obtained from numerical analysis of perfobond shear connectors are compared with design procedures developed from different authors.
C3  - ce/papers
T1  - 08.49: Comparison of headed studs with perfobond shear connectors - experimental and numerical analysis
EP  - 2246
IS  - 2-3
SP  - 2237
VL  - 1
DO  - 10.1002/cepa.270
ER  - 
@conference{
author = "Spremić, Milan and Gluhović, Nina and Marković, Zlatko and Dobrić, Jelena and Filipović, Aljoša",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Different  types  of  shear  connectors  which  assure  composite  action  between  steel  profile  and concrete  slabs  have  been  developed  during  decades,  considering different  shapes,  installation equipment  and  installation  process.  Also,  three  main  characteristics  of  shear  connectors,  shear resistance, stiffness and ductility are specific for each type of shear connector. Widely used shear connectors  for  composite  constructions  of  buildings  and  bridges  are  headed  studs  and  different types of perfobond shear connectors. Different behaviour of these types of shear connectors, mainly reflected  in  unsatisfactory behaviour of headed  studs resulted from fatigue problems, reflects in their  various  applications.  Numerous  experimental  and  numerical  investigations  performed  with headed  studs  and  perfobond  shear  connectors  through  standard  push-out  tests  resulted  in development  of  design  procedures  which  are  proposed  by  different  authors  or  can  be  found  in current design codes such as EN 1994-1-1, ANSI/AISC-360-05 and JSCE. Comparison of heads stud’s and perfobond shear connector’s beahviour through experimental results of standard push-out tests are presented in this paper. Experimentally obtained shear resistance of four headed studs with 16  mm  diameter  and  100  mm  height,  positioned  in  one  row  into  envisaged  openings  of prefabricated composite decks, with shear resistance of perfobond shear connectors are compared. Main differences in respect of ductility, stiffness and different failure modes which can be noticed for these types of shear connections, obtained from experimental investigation are analyzed in this paper.  Comparative  analysis  includes  different  shapes,  dimensions  and  specimen’s  layout  of perfobond  shear  connectors,  experimentally  investigated  through  standard  push-out  tests  which results are available in different literature. Numerical analysis included perfobond shear connectors positioned into envisaged openings of prefabricated composite decks with same dimensions and material  properties  which  are  used  for  numerical  analysis  of  considered  headed  studs  shear connection and which are obtained from experimental investigation. Shear resistance obtained from numerical analysis of perfobond shear connectors are compared with design procedures developed from different authors.",
journal = "ce/papers",
title = "08.49: Comparison of headed studs with perfobond shear connectors - experimental and numerical analysis",
pages = "2246-2237",
number = "2-3",
volume = "1",
doi = "10.1002/cepa.270"
}
Spremić, M., Gluhović, N., Marković, Z., Dobrić, J.,& Filipović, A.. (2017). 08.49: Comparison of headed studs with perfobond shear connectors - experimental and numerical analysis. in ce/papers, 1(2-3), 2237-2246.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.270
Spremić M, Gluhović N, Marković Z, Dobrić J, Filipović A. 08.49: Comparison of headed studs with perfobond shear connectors - experimental and numerical analysis. in ce/papers. 2017;1(2-3):2237-2246.
doi:10.1002/cepa.270 .
Spremić, Milan, Gluhović, Nina, Marković, Zlatko, Dobrić, Jelena, Filipović, Aljoša, "08.49: Comparison of headed studs with perfobond shear connectors - experimental and numerical analysis" in ce/papers, 1, no. 2-3 (2017):2237-2246,
https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.270 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the GraFar Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceCommunitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the GraFar Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB