Приказ основних података о документу

dc.contributorda Silva, Ana Maria
dc.contributorRennie, Colin
dc.contributorGaskin, Susan
dc.contributorLacey, Jay
dc.contributorMacVicar, Bruce
dc.creatorKimura, Ichiro
dc.creatorBousmar, Didier
dc.creatorArchambeau, Pierre
dc.creatorDewals, Benjamin
dc.creatorErpicum, Sebastien
dc.creatorPirotton, Michel
dc.creatorLi, X.
dc.creatorĐorđević, Dejana
dc.creatorRosić, Nikola
dc.creatorZindović, Budo
dc.creatorEcheverribar, Isabel
dc.creatorNavas-Montilla, Adrian
dc.creatorBrufau, P.
dc.creatorGarcia-Navarro, Pilar
dc.creatorGonzales de Linares, Matthieu
dc.creatorPaquier, Andre
dc.creatorKopmann, Rebekka
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-28T11:01:37Z
dc.date.available2022-12-28T11:01:37Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://queensuca-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/r/personal/amsilva_queensu_ca/Documents/River%20Flow%202022_Papers1/Day%201_AM%20(Morning)/Session_A1/Kimura_A009.pdf?csf=1&web=1&e=5j9MEx
dc.identifier.urihttps://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2942
dc.description.abstractThe benchmarking test of 2D and 3D numerical models on a compound channel flow with a rectangular-shaped main channel and a rectangular-shaped floodplain was carried out by the IAHR Working Group on Compound Channels. The selected test case is the flume experiment by Nezu and Tominaga (1991). Nine depth-averaged 2D models and four 3D models participated in the benchmark. In the 2D models, the depth-averaged streamwise velocity profiles in the lateral direction were compared. In the 3D models, velocity components in three directions as well as the distribution of the turbulence kinetic energy in a cross-section were compared. Through the comparison, the applicability and limitations of each model are highlighted and discussed with regard to the model characteristics.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherQueen’s University, Canadasr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Technological Development (TD or TR)/37010/RS//sr
dc.rightsopenAccesssr
dc.sourceProceedings of 11th International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics - River Flow 2022 (on-line)sr
dc.subjectcompound channelsr
dc.subject2D and 3D modelssr
dc.subjecttesting and assessmentsr
dc.subjectbenchmarksr
dc.titleFlow structure in a compound channel: benchmarking 2D and 3D numerical modelssr
dc.typeconferenceObjectsr
dc.rights.licenseARRsr
dc.rights.holderSvi autori radasr
dc.citation.spageA009
dc.description.otherKonferencija je održana na daljinu (on-line), bez fizičkog prisustva i sav materijal se nalazi na web-stranici organizatora skupa.sr
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/11163/KimuraEtAl_Paper_A009-RiverFlow2022.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubhttps://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_grafar_2942
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу