This paper presents the evaluation of methods for predicting the ultimate axial bearing capacity of single piles based on the cone penetration test (CPT) results, and the evaluation of static methods based on the effective and total stress analysis. Seventeen jacked-in MEGA piles and eight Franki piles of different lengths are considered. The results show that the Bustamante & Gianeselli (LCPC) method is the most appropriate for the studied geotechnical conditions and pile types.
Keywords:
jacked-in MEGA pile / Franki pile / pile axial capacity / static load test
TY - JOUR
AU - Vukićević, Mirjana
AU - Marjanović, Miloš
AU - Pujević, Veljko
AU - Obradović, Nikola
PY - 2018
UR - http://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/981
AB - This paper presents the evaluation of methods for predicting the ultimate axial bearing capacity of single piles based on the cone penetration test (CPT) results, and the evaluation of static methods based on the effective and total stress analysis. Seventeen jacked-in MEGA piles and eight Franki piles of different lengths are considered. The results show that the Bustamante & Gianeselli (LCPC) method is the most appropriate for the studied geotechnical conditions and pile types.
PB - Union of Croatian Civil Engineers and Technicians
T2 - Građevinar
T1 - Evaluation of methods for predicting axial capacity of jacked-in and driven piles in cohesive soils
EP - 693
IS - 8
SP - 685
VL - 70
DO - 10.14256/JCE.2175.2017
ER -
@article{
author = "Vukićević, Mirjana and Marjanović, Miloš and Pujević, Veljko and Obradović, Nikola",
year = "2018",
url = "http://grafar.grf.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/981",
abstract = "This paper presents the evaluation of methods for predicting the ultimate axial bearing capacity of single piles based on the cone penetration test (CPT) results, and the evaluation of static methods based on the effective and total stress analysis. Seventeen jacked-in MEGA piles and eight Franki piles of different lengths are considered. The results show that the Bustamante & Gianeselli (LCPC) method is the most appropriate for the studied geotechnical conditions and pile types.",
publisher = "Union of Croatian Civil Engineers and Technicians",
journal = "Građevinar",
title = "Evaluation of methods for predicting axial capacity of jacked-in and driven piles in cohesive soils",
pages = "693-685",
number = "8",
volume = "70",
doi = "10.14256/JCE.2175.2017"
}
Vukićević M, Marjanović M, Pujević V, Obradović N. Evaluation of methods for predicting axial capacity of jacked-in and driven piles in cohesive soils. Građevinar. 2018;70(8):685-693
Vukićević, M., Marjanović, M., Pujević, V.,& Obradović, N. (2018). Evaluation of methods for predicting axial capacity of jacked-in and driven piles in cohesive soils.
GrađevinarUnion of Croatian Civil Engineers and Technicians., 70(8), 685-693.
https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.2175.2017
Vukićević Mirjana, Marjanović Miloš, Pujević Veljko, Obradović Nikola, "Evaluation of methods for predicting axial capacity of jacked-in and driven piles in cohesive soils" 70, no. 8 (2018):685-693,
https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.2175.2017 .
